Scott McMillan Law Firm , La Mesa, is 15 miles east of downtown San Diego, and sued for legal malpractice & fraud by a top law firm in federal court, http://legalnewsline.com/stories/510992237-the-mcmillan-law-firm-allegedly-sent-inflated-bill-to-client

In another recent appeal, a federal appellate judge called a case Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney, a "silly case" not based on "principle" see the short video for yourself https://www.dailymotion.com/scottmcmillanlawlamesa

In yet a different case he lost, “Scott [ McMillan ] and Shawn McMillan (licensed atty) appeal pro se the district court's order striking their claim against Commercial Real Property…Here, the McMillans cannot claim an ownership interest in Commercial Real Property based on the assertion that the property lacked evidence of title….Accordingly, the district court did not err by striking the McMillan's claim for lack of standing. See Elias. 990 F.2d at 1523. (United States v. Commercial Real Prop. (9th Cir. July 18, 1994, No. 93-56173) 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19460, at *5.)

Vexatious litigant file meritless cases or abuse the court system. Scott McMillan, La Mesa, McMillan v. Weathersby (9th Cir. 2002) 31 F.App'x 371, 374, complained about his loss, and being called a “None of the three main episodes that McMillan offers supports granting a mistrial. McMillan first asserts that defense counsel violated the court's in limine ruling barring reference to McMillan as a "vexatious litigant" by referring to McMillan's other lawsuits in his opening statement.” Yes, Scott McMillan lost that case too concerning his vexatious litigation.

Only some of the most recent loses of Scott McMillan La Mesa Attorney include:

• Williams v. Nordstrom, Inc., SD Sup Ct. 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL, Plaintiff and Scott McMillan were sanctioned nearly $16,000 for discovery abuse; case on appeal, see Case Number D069051 (note McMillan says the judgment was reversed - however it was agreed to reverse between the parties as part of a settlement agreement - NOT because the court of appeal found the judge committed an error! Hence, McMillan appears to have committed malpractice, got his client to agree to settle, and was unable to avoid yet another legal malpractice claim, and to pay sanctions)

• Williams v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Nordstrom, Inc., D068765, 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL (writ denied)

• McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc. 37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL, D067610 (writ denied) [law firm posted its OWN reviews]

• Williams v. Digius et al. Case No. D064183 (opposed defendant’s appeal and lost)

• Oceans Eleven Casino v. Anders, Case Number S219395 (lost California Supreme Court case)

• Bridgeman v. Allen et al., Case Number D062183 (lost appeal AND McMillan’s client forced to pay costs of respondent)

Scott McMillan , La Mesa attorney is also a Dean of his own law school, McMillan Academy of Law - a school review site says has NOT HAD A STUDENT OR A STUDENT PASS THE STATE BAR!!!! Is this a fraudulent tax write off? (This is only a question) Why else have failed business exist unless there is some benefit to it. (This is only my reasoning and opinion) This 'law school' has been around for over a decade - not a single attorney? (This is only a fact!!) See an independent review of the law school, http://campus-search.lawdragon.com/schools/mcmillan-academy-of-law/

Back to a few more cases Scott McMillan lost,

• Morton v. Spotts, Case Number D058640 (McMillan lost appeal – his client lost at trial and found liable for $15,000)
• Plikaytis v. Fairmont, L.P. et al. Case Number D066876 (lost appeal)

• McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc.D067610

37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL (case where law firm was sued by Yelp! for posting its OWN REVIEWS – lost writ petition)

• Kelegian v. Anders et al., Case Number D067328 (Transfer/certification denied)