Scott McMillan La Mesa Attorney, www.mcmillanlaw.us, filed a declaration in an effort to save his losing case against the San DIego ATF office.Scott McMillan, McMillan_Law_Firm, filed a false statement, in my view since none of the agents were arrested or convicted, in Lycurgan, Inc. v. Todd Jones (ATF Chief) Case 3:14-cv-01679-JLS-BGS McMillan declaration alleges federal agents abused him, vandalized and stole property:

“I believe that ATF agents took the missing unfinished lower receivers as what they perceive as “war booty.” As the ATF agents as a group had already internally dehumanized my client and his company, stealing Lycurgan’s property was no different than vandalizing the premises at National City. Although the agents were sworn to uphold the law, they found neither act particularly morally repugnant, and both in some way gratifying. Although the damaged store cannot be unvandalized, certainly the “war booty” can and should be returned.”
See declaration, http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/07-Lycurgan-v-Jones-Lycurgan-I_Supplemental-Declaration-of-Scott-A-McMillan-in-Support-of-Plaintiff-Lycurgan-Incs-Reply-Brief.pdf If the statements were true, why weren't any of the agents charged with crimes, or any mention were disciplined?

In yet another case a federal court found Scott McMillan , McMillan Law Firm www.mcmillanlaw.us , La Mesa, had absolutely no right to try to include himself in a lawsuit to get money from the Government, resulting in thousands of dollars of tax payers dollars to defend the meritless lawsuit; the court said the, “Property based on the assertion that the property lacked evidence of title….Accordingly, the district court did not err by striking the McMillan's claim for lack of standing. See Elias. 990 F.2d at 1523. (United States v. Commercial Real Prop. (9th Cir. July 18, 1994, No. 93-56173) 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19460, at *5.)

In the same meritless case, Scott McMillan attorney La Mesa forced the Government to spends thousands of dollars of tax payers money in a frivolous appeal where he sued a federal law enforcement agency in Lycurgan, Inc. v. Todd JonesFiled (ATF Chief), Ninth Cir., Case No. 15-55228, SDCA Case No. 3:14-cv-01424,the court dismissed since the order was NOT an appealable order:

"11/18/2015 Filed order (STEPHEN R. REINHARDT, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and N. RANDY SMITH) We conclude that the December 17, 2014 order and “judgment” dismissing appellant’s claim without prejudice was not intended to be a final and appealable order. See Montes v. United States, 37 F.3d 1347, 1351 (9th Cir. 1994) (the “First Judgment” dismissing an action without prejudice “was not intended to be a final and appealable order” where the district court permitted plaintiff to file an amended complaint “after entering the First Judgment”) (emphasis in original). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [9760042] (WL) [Entered: 11/18/2015 09:58 AM]"

See docket https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/2mvkkn6qp/court-of-appeals-for-the-ninth-circuit/lycurgan-inc-v-todd-jones/